RESPONSE
FOR 10/31
I really enjoyed reading “Physical
Evidence” by Kelly Carlisle because the various techniques she uses in her
memoir work really well. I thought it as interesting how we didn’t get a lot of
details about anything. There wasn’t a whole lot of descriptive imagery, unless
she was envisioning her mother. For example, on page 91, she writes, “One night
when I was eight my grandfather and I sat in the dining room table, our empty
plates and glasses still before us.” This lets us know that they are sitting at
the table and have finished eating, but we don’t get any description of the
house or the table itself, if it’s round, rectangular, old, new, etc. All of
that is left up to the reader, and I think that works for this story. I think
her only describing her mother, like when she writes on page 93, “I imagine my
mother naked, spread-eagled, her foot touching a crumpled bag of Fritos, an
empty can of been by her side. It was 1976, and so I figured it must have been
one of those steel cans of Bud with the pull-away tab.” This is a really
intense description of her mother and of her surroundings. It’s very detailed,
especially when she says the “crumpled” bag of chips and the specific type of
beer can she imagined. She gives descriptions like this more in the story, like
on the top of page 92. I think the author does this to emphasize the things
that she thinks are important, without coming out and directly saying it. We
see through her descriptions, or lack thereof, what she really is interested in,
because she takes special notice to it. In this story, she’s most interested in
any detail of her mom. I think I could take this technique and put it in my own
writing, especially since I have a tendency to not put enough description from
the beginning.